Page 49 - Management Digest Udyama Vol 1 Isuue 2
P. 49

The concept of management       while Aristotle is  the practitioner
            draws from and is an object of   basing his acts on empirical
            study in philosophy, history,   search.
            political science, sociology,
            psychology, military science    Weber brought to modern
            and theology while the concept   sociology and by extension to
            of leadership is also an area of   management theory the ancient
            interest and study for most of   Greek term of “charisma”
            these fields.                   which means a gift of grace,
                                            a mysterious personality
            A broad discussion has emerged   characteristic of an individual
            concerning similarities and     personality.
            differences between leaders and
            managers as persons, and of     Managers and leaders appeal to
            leadership and management as a   their subordinates and followers
            process revealed by observable   because of their heroic, religious
            behaviour of such persons.      or ethical aptitudes, skills or
                                            dexterities irrespective of the
            Bennis and Nanus, in a book     reality of actually being so or
            considered significant for
            management, considered           “Great Men” and the Business
            managers as persons who         world
            master routines and accomplish
            prescribed activities in contrast   As management theories
            to leaders who influence others   developed in the last few decades,
            and provide visions: “Managers   the “Great Man” concept in
            are people who do things right   politics and religion shifted to
            and leaders are people who do the   the business world. A corollary
            right things”.                  to this was the introduction of the
                                            theory differentiating transactional
                                            leadership and transformational
            Plato, Aristotle & Weber        leadership.

            For Plato, leaders are not born   Transactional leadership in
            with the innate capacity to     management theory presupposes
            manage but must be carefully    an exchange process of
            chosen and trained to do so     mutual dependence founded
            and through proper education    in the authority structure of an
            become aristocrats of merit and   enterprise or organization. This
            knowledge.                      type of managerial leadership
                                            appeals to the subordinates and
            Aristotle did not favour        follower’s self-interest and the
            aristocracy and insisted that   manager-leader’s clarification
            leaders-managers should acquire   of work tasks and expectations,
            ‘sophrosyne’ (Σωφροσύνη is      and corresponding rewards or
            a Greek a term designating      punishments.
            temperance and prudence and
            even a harmonious state of      Transformational leadership
            self-control).                  shows the significance of human
                                            relations qualities in the crucial
            Placing matters in a            interdependency of the manager-
            contemporary, modern Human      leader-subordinate-follower
            Resource management             relationship, resulting in elevated
            terminology we can say that     dedication to goal achievement in
            Plato’s is a qualitative approach to  private or public enterprises and
            management and leadership       organizations.



                                                                                    September 2021          47
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54